Submission I:

Criteria	Points?	Why?
Purpose	Yes	The purpose, functionality, input, and output are described.
Data Abstraction	No	Neither criteria were met. There is a way to program the app without a list, which makes it so that the list does not fulfill the program's purpose.
Managing Complexity	No	Again, the list is there just because it is a requirement. It does not actually manage the complexity of the application.
Procedural Abstraction	No	The procedure is student developed, but the actual procedure, due to the lack of data abstraction and complexity management, is not useful and is inefficient.
Algorithmic Implementation	Yes	The algorithm is in enough detail that another could recreate it, and it is also student developed.
Testing	Yes	It described both calls to the procedure, described the conditions that were passed through, and identified the result of each call.

Submission II:

Criteria	Points?	Why?
Purpose	Yes	The purpose, functionality, input, and output are described.
Data Abstraction	Yes	Both program segments are shown, the list variable is identified, and the data of the list is used in the program.
Managing Complexity	Yes	The program both had a list being used to manage complexity as well as explained how the program depends on the list.
Procedural Abstraction	Yes	The procedure is both efficient enough and student-developed.
Algorithmic Implementation	Yes	The algorithm is in enough detail that another could recreate it, and it is also student developed
Testing	Yes	It described both calls to the procedure, described the conditions that were passed through, and identified the result of each call.

Criteria	Points?	Why?
Purpose	Yes	The purpose, functionality, input, and output are described.
Data Abstraction	No	Neither criteria were met. There is a way to program the app without a list, which makes it so that the list does not fulfill the program's purpose.
Managing Complexity	No	Again, the list is there just because it is a requirement. It does not actually manage the complexity of the application.
Procedural Abstraction	No	The procedure is student developed, but the actual procedure, due to the lack of data abstraction and complexity management, is not useful and is inefficient.
Algorithmic Implementation	No	The algorithm does not include iteration. It also is not explained how the index value completely works.
Testing	No	There was no call to the selected procedure, the conditions were not described, and neither were the results of the call.

Criteria	Points?	Why?
Purpose	Yes	The purpose, functionality, input, and output are described.
Data Abstraction	Yes	Both program segments are shown, the list variable is identified, and the data of the list is used in the program.
Managing Complexity	Yes	The program both had a list being used to manage complexity as well as explained how the program depends on the list.
Procedural Abstraction	Yes	The procedure is both efficient enough and student-developed.
Algorithmic Implementation	Yes	The algorithm is in enough detail that another could recreate it, and it is also student developed
Testing	No	The description of how and where the function was being called, the conditions used, and the result, are not good enough.

In my own words, the criteria are:

Do I have a code segment that shows my own procedure (with at least one parameter) having an effect on the application's functionality?
Do I have a code segment where said procedure is being called?