Individual/Team engagement rating: .45 of .50 basis (.30 did not participate to .45 instrumental participation)

Team Member Grade Explanation
Varaprasad 0.94 Varaprasad did thorough research that provided detail and sound information to our lesson
Tanay 0.91 Without Tanay, we wouldn’t have had sound information or a good presentation overall. His work on presenting the pros and cons really helped tie a crucial part of our lesson together
Rachit 0.93 Rachit’s live demo was vital to our lesson, as it provided it with a hands-on real application of what we were teaching, making the lesson much better and more engaging.
Tanisha 0.92 Tanisha and Luna’s work on the overall structure of the first half of the lesson really made the information and teaching of JWT so much better.
Luna 0.92 Tanisha and Luna’s work on the overall structure of the first half of the lesson really made the information and teaching of JWT so much better.

Logistics with Teacher .50 basis, provide evidence

Criteria Grade Evidence
Lesson posted and comments TBD I did the pull request for our team and had it up with utterances on the Teacher Portfolio.
Grading complete and on time TBD Since almost all students themselves did not get it on time, we had to dely our grading.
Elements of creativity or success TBD Rachit’s live demo, me tying the lesson back to CollegeBoard concepts, Varaprasad tying the lesson to the Thymeleaf lesson